Title: | Stanford Seminar - Concepts and Questions as Programs |
---|
Description
Both AI and cognitive science can gain by studying the human solutions to difficult computational problems [1]. My talk will focus on two problems: concept learning and question asking. Compared to the best algorithms, people can learn new concepts from fewer examples, and then use their concepts in richer ways -- for imagination, extrapolation, and explanation, not just classification. Moreover, learning is often an active process; people can ask rich and probing questions in order to reduce uncertainty, while standard active learning algorithms ask simple and stereotyped queries. I will discuss my work on program induction as a cognitive model and potential solution for extracting richer concepts from less data, with applications to learning handwritten characters [2] and learning recursive visual concepts from examples. I will also discuss program synthesis as a model of question asking in simple games [3]. [1] Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., and Gershman, S. J. (2016). Building machines that learn and think like people. Preprint available on arXiv:1604.00289. [2] Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., and Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015). Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science, 350(6266), 1332-1338. [3] Rothe, A., Lake, B. M., and Gureckis, T. M. (2016). Asking and evaluating natural language questions. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Get notified about new study groups every week!

Stanford Seminar - Concepts and Questions as Programs
-
Type
-
Provider
-
PricingFree
-
Duration1 hour 18 minutes
Both AI and cognitive science can gain by studying the human solutions to difficult computational problems [1]. My talk will focus on two problems: concept learning and question asking. Compared to the best algorithms, people can learn new concepts from fewer examples, and then use their concepts in richer ways -- for imagination, extrapolation, and explanation, not just classification. Moreover, learning is often an active process; people can ask rich and probing questions in order to reduce uncertainty, while standard active learning algorithms ask simple and stereotyped queries. I will discuss my work on program induction as a cognitive model and potential solution for extracting richer concepts from less data, with applications to learning handwritten characters [2] and learning recursive visual concepts from examples. I will also discuss program synthesis as a model of question asking in simple games [3]. [1] Lake, B. M., Ullman, T. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., and Gershman, S. J. (2016). Building machines that learn and think like people. Preprint available on arXiv:1604.00289. [2] Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., and Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015). Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction. Science, 350(6266), 1332-1338. [3] Rothe, A., Lake, B. M., and Gureckis, T. M. (2016). Asking and evaluating natural language questions. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Get notified about new study groups every week!